The 12 appellants dissatisfied with the judgment of the appellee (ie the company) in the false statement of liability of the securities, and refused to accept the judgment of the (2016) Guangdong 01 Character Min 5-16 Civil Judgment (12) The appellant first ordered the company to compensate him 2,733,600 yuan, and the first-instance judgment dismissed the appellant's claim.) To the senior of Guangdong Province, Foshan Lighting received the (2016) Guangdong People's Court from the Guangdong Provincial People's Court. The legal document of Civil Notice No. 1852. The 12 appellants dissatisfied with the judgment of the appellee (ie the company) in the false statement of liability of the securities, and refused to accept the judgment of the (2016) Guangdong 01 Character Min 5-16 Civil Judgment (12) The appellant first ordered the company to compensate him 2,733,600 yuan, the first-instance judgment dismissed the appellant's claim, and appealed to the Guangdong Higher People's Court (for details, please see the company published on the website of Juchao on November 23, 2016). Announcement on the Progress of Litigation Matters (II), Announcement No.: 2016-061). The Higher People's Court of Guangdong Province has made the following judgment on the appeal: 1. Dismissed the appeal and upheld the original judgment. 2. The acceptance fee for the second instance case shall be borne by the appellant.

Innosilicon A9

miner bitmain,bitcoin mining hardware,A9 bitmain miner

Fancy Tiles Co,. Ltd. , https://www.tilefancy.com