The media claimed that some experts are childcare advocates for interest groups.

Recently, the Palace Museum issued a statement on its official website that when the hospital is in service and retirees participate in social cultural relics appraisal activities, they should obtain written authorization from the Palace Museum. Otherwise, it is a personal act and the consequences are borne by me. The Palace Museum does not Take responsibility.

The announcement made by the Palace Museum is obviously a last resort. After many years of accumulation, the Palace Museum has produced many experts and scholars in the field of bronze ware, jade ware, porcelain, calligraphy and painting. For example, Xu Bangda, Dan Shiyuan, Zhu Jiaxuan, Yan Baochang, Wang Shizhen, etc. These people have no knowledge because of their own knowledge. It arguably entered the Identification Committee of the State Administration of Cultural Heritage. These experts have been very low-key all their lives, rarely show their face and indulge in their own professional field to enjoy themselves. However, in the sensational turmoil that has been disclosed in the past year or two, experts from the National Palace Museum have been involved. In many kinds of Kampo programs or activities, many specious experts also took advantage of their experience in the National Palace Museum, National Museums and other big countries' cultural and cultural organizations. They freely pointed at the country and inevitably pointed to the deer as a horse. The joke has also caused the literate people to sneak away, making the auction community in the middle of chaos and a lot of experts to help.

In recent years, experts seem to be draining frequently. Some so-called experts in the field of science and technology appeared in the appraisal meetings of various new technologies; some experts in the medical field appeared at the press conferences for various new drugs; economists became defenders of certain interest groups and violated them. Common sense to publicize some of the paradox of the public to spray rice; the school’s famous professor also serves as a consultant of the useless creative park, mouth-opening; there are also some so-called historians, for some local cultural development advice, put some local myths The legend explains why it has become so hype; more pseudo-experts have become media stars, and they have made irresponsible remarks on various issues. They have forgotten who they are. These experts have only one word that can be summed up appropriately. That is “child care”. It seems that more and more of our experts are using one school to take advantage of what we have learned as a good service for the community. However, there is a slight sadness.

To love the feathers is not a high standard, but when the expert becomes a derogatory term, this basic benchmark has also become a luxury.

Next:Installation, use and regulation of marine diesel generator sets
Previous:No one mentioned after the military holiday that only three of the vicious culprits returned to the army